Divine Will and the Occurrence of Nature: Analysis and Criticism of Avicenna's and Ghazali's Views

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran,

2 Visiting Professor, Faculty of Low, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In this article, after a brief explanation of some key terms, one of Avicenna's reasons for the oldness of the natural world and Ghazali's criticisms of him are examined and analyzed, and in some cases, Mulla Sadra's comments in agreement with Avicenna are mentioned. Furthermore, the problems of each point of view are stated separately and the limits of each view's defense of its own theory are pointed out and judged. In Avicenna's argument, two rules are used, one related to philosophical public affairs and the other belonging to the realm of philosophical theology. In the analysis and explanation of the arguments of each side, the conclusion has been reached that the main problem is the issue of the supreme will, and the key to solving the problem is understanding the nature of the will of the Necessary Being. For this purpose, we presented Avicenna's and Ghazali's views on this matter and tried to reveal the correct and acceptable opinion on the will of the Necessary Being, and the oldness or creation of the natural world, although the effort failed. Finally, an opinion of the early philosophers, from Avicenna to Sabzewari, regarding the unity of knowledge, will, and action in the Necessary Being is proposed. The final result, with these limits of reason, is the incompleteness of all theories about the will of the Necessary Being and the temporary preference of the philosophers' theory about the oldness of the world.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

The Holy Quran
Ghazali, Mohammad. 1982. Tahafot al-Falasefah (The Incoherence of the Philosophers), Foreworded & Edited by Majed Fakhri, Beirut: Catholic Press, Second Edition. [in Arabic]
Ibn Sina, Hosayn ibn Abdollah. 1984. Hojjat al-Hagh, Elahiyat Shefa (God's Argument, Theology of Healing), Edited & Foreworded by Ibrahim Madkur, Tehran: Naser Khosrow. [in Arabic]
Ibrahimi Dinani, Gholam Hosayn. 1976. Ghawaed Kolli Falsafi dar Falsafeh Islami (General Philosophical Rules in Islamic Philosophy), Tehran: Iranian Wisdom and Philosophy Association, vol. 1. [in Farsi]
Jafari, Mohammad Taghi. 2005. Tafsir wa Tahlil wa Naghd Mathnawi Jalal al-Din Mohammad Mawlawi Balkhi (Interpretation, Analysis and Criticism of Mathnawi Jalal al-Din Mohammad Mawlawi Balkhi), Tehran: Publication of Islamic Thought, vol. 8. [in Farsi]
Library of Shiite Hadiths, www.hadithlib.com
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Mohammad ibn Ibrahim. 1981. Al-Shawahed al-Robubiyah fi al-Manahej al-Solukiyah (Evidence of God's Lordship in the Methods of Journey to Him), Edited & Annotated by Sayyed Jalal al-Din Ashtiyani, Tehran: Offset University Publishing Center, Second Edition. [in Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Mohammad ibn Ibrahim. 2001. Al-Hekmah al-Motealiyah fi al-Asfar al-Arbaah (Transcendent Wisdom in the Four Journeys), Edited by Maghsud Mohammadi, Supervised by Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei, Tehran: Sadra Islamic Wisdom Foundation. [in Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Mohammad ibn Ibrahim. 2002. Al-Hekmah al-Motealiyah fi al-Asfar al-Arbaah al-Aghliyah (Transcendent Wisdom in the Four Intellectual Journeys), Foreworded & Edited by Ahmad Ahmadi, Tehran: Sadra Islamic Wisdom Foundation, vol. 6. [in Arabic]
Taheri, Seyyed Sadr al-Din. 1997. Elliyat az Didgah Ashaerah wa Hiyum (Causality from the Point of View of Asharites and Hume), Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought, First Edition. [in Farsi]
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics