نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The revelation (waḥy) and its quality has since the beginning of Prophet Muhammad’s prophethood been a focus of attentions by intellectuals. The fact that the origin of revelations is non-human (God) and its receiver is a human has led to difficulties such as the process of understanding the nature of the revelation, how it is revealed, how it is interpreted and explained, and so on. This is evidenced by disagreements over how to explain and interpret the revelation among philosophers and rationalist intellectuals. In this research, we believe that their method of interpreting the revelation leads to disagreements, and then provide a comparative study of the account of the revelation offered by religious modernists, such as Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd, who believe that the origin of the revelation is non-human, while its external reality derives from the culture of the time, historical backgrounds, and human experiences, and Mullā Ṣadrā as a representative of the traditional religious current who takes both the origin and the external reality of the revelation to be divine and sacred.
کلیدواژهها English
عنوان مقاله العربیة
الوحی فی الفلسفة التقلیدیة والکلام المعاصر: تحلیل مقارن لرأی الملا صدرا ونصر حامد أبو زید
چکیده العربیةکلیدواژهها العربیة
